Exploring the Consequences of Organised Crime and Illegal Trade Displacement on Eurasia

Project Live

PROJECT TEAM

Headshot of Doctor Erica Marat

Dr Erica Marat

College of International Security Affairs, National Defense University

Contact: Erica.marat.civ@ndu.edu

Dr. Erica Marat is a Professor at the College of Security Affairs of the National Defense University. Her research focuses on violence, mobilisation and security institutions in Eurasia, India, and Mexico. Before joining NDU, Dr. Marat was a visiting scholar at the Kennan Institute of the Woodrow Wilson Center.  She is an author of The Politics of Police Reform: Society against the State in Post-Soviet Countries (OUP 2018) and other books. Her articles have appeared in Foreign Affairs,  Foreign Policy, Washington Post, Just Security, and Open Democracy.

 
Headshot of Doctor Alexander Kupatadze

Dr Alexander Kupatadze

King’s College London

Contact: Alexander.kupatadze@kcl.ac.uk

Dr Alexander Kupatadze is Associate Professor at King’s College London. Prior to joining King’s College Dr Kupatadze taught at the School of International Relations, St Andrews University. He held the postdoctoral positions at George Washington University (2010-11), Oxford University (2012-13) and Princeton University (2013-14). His research specialisation is organised crime, corruption, public sector reform, informal politics and crime-terror nexus. His regional expertise is post-Soviet Eurasia. His work has appeared in Journal of Democracy, Theoretical Criminology, Nonproliferation Review, British Journal of Political Science and other leading journals. His research has been funded by European Union, British  Academy and Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation.

 
Logo: King's College London

PROJECT SUMMARY

The war in Ukraine and sanctions on Russia are leading to tectonic changes in Eurasia’s illicit scene. Organised crime is taking new forms in the region, its borderlands, and seaports. The war has disrupted licit and illicit supply chains throughout the region, changed routes of trafficking and shifted production of illicit commodities. Meanwhile, sanctions on Russia made established forms of trade suddenly illegal, making the illicit supply of certain goods the only way to meet unchanged consumer demand, at potentially high profit margins for criminals. As a consequence, new opportunities arose for criminal networks, including the smuggling of banned and sanctioned commodities (e.g. luxury goods, semiconductors, microchips, etc.), smuggling of deficit products (goods facing shortages in Russia and Ukraine due to disrupted supply chains), trading in looted commodities (e.g. cultural artefacts stolen from the museums under occupation in Ukraine), and cash smuggling from Russia and Ukraine to neighbouring countries. Simultaneously, illegal arms markets got a boost as weapons were diverted from the frontlines and human trafficking increased exponentially due to the large outflow of refugees and military-age men from Ukraine.

The project aims to understand changing dynamics in respect of the following:

a)  Threats in borderlands and seaports, such as the displacement of threats, shifting trafficking routes and trafficking of new commodities;
b) Opportunities in neighbouring countries as legal companies and criminal enterprises step in to fill the void of meeting the demand on sanctioned goods in Russia;
c) Actors in smuggling and trafficking, specifically who are the perpetrators on the ground: private companies, individuals, underworld networks?
d) Elite bargains related with illicit flows. Are new lucrative opportunities emerging as an issue for bargaining/intra-elite deals? Are emerging opportunities confined to borderlands and seaports or do they extend to capitals?
e) Law enforcement capacity, specifically how security forces are coping with large inflows and outflows of trafficked commodities and how custom and border authorities are catching up with innovative schemes.


PUBLICATIONS

ENGAGEMENT

Previous
Previous

Organised crime as irregular warfare: a framework for assessment and strategic response

Next
Next

Unlocking the black box of political will on IFFs: Going beyond technical responses